Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Mercer County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 270
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Mercer County, North Dakota totaled $8,600,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Travis S Horning | Zap, ND 58580 | $61,952 |
42 | Bryan Aalund | Hazen, ND 58545 | $59,849 |
43 | Kelly Aalund | Hazen, ND 58545 | $59,849 |
44 | Terrance Lamert Meuchel | Hebron, ND 58638 | $59,675 |
45 | Corey Micheal Voegele | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $56,805 |
46 | James A Swenson | Beulah, ND 58523 | $56,733 |
47 | Calvin Paul Kusmenko | Zap, ND 58580 | $55,168 |
48 | Max Miller | Hazen, ND 58545 | $51,240 |
49 | Clayton Boeckel | Beulah, ND 58523 | $49,810 |
50 | Ronald Gunsch | Zap, ND 58580 | $48,425 |
51 | Farm Credit Services Of Nd ** | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $47,825 |
52 | Daniel John Weinand | Hazen, ND 58545 | $47,755 |
53 | Allegra Ida Boeckel | Hazen, ND 58545 | $47,745 |
54 | Leroy Leonard Boeckel | Hazen, ND 58545 | $47,745 |
55 | Fred Bieri | Dodge, ND 58625 | $47,384 |
56 | Robert Fitterer Jr | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $47,217 |
57 | Jean J Hoepfner | Beulah, ND 58523 | $47,036 |
58 | Adron Loy Doerr | Zap, ND 58580 | $45,619 |
59 | Kim Kessler | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $44,040 |
60 | Tjay Gustafson | Beulah, ND 58523 | $43,280 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”