Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Mercer County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 270
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Mercer County, North Dakota totaled $8,600,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Roger Boehler | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $11,396 |
142 | North Hill Angus LLC | Beulah, ND 58523 | $11,152 |
143 | Bradley Virgil Gunsch | Beulah, ND 58523 | $11,119 |
144 | Joshua Cotton | Stanton, ND 58571 | $11,101 |
145 | Jesse James Hauser | Hebron, ND 58638 | $11,069 |
146 | Emil Lapp Jr | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $11,029 |
147 | Scheid Livestock Llp | Hazen, ND 58545 | $11,000 |
148 | Channing Hatzenbuhler | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $10,848 |
149 | Ronald A Isaak | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $10,753 |
150 | Logan Behm | Beulah, ND 58523 | $10,670 |
151 | Shawn Stelter | Beulah, ND 58523 | $10,650 |
152 | James Patrick Hauser | Hebron, ND 58638 | $10,283 |
153 | Kordell Michael Stiefel | Zap, ND 58580 | $9,636 |
154 | Dave Sebastian | Hazen, ND 58545 | $9,485 |
155 | Cory Berger | Stanton, ND 58571 | $9,373 |
156 | Christopher Palmer | Zap, ND 58580 | $9,295 |
157 | Rory Clemence Flemmer | Beulah, ND 58523 | $9,217 |
158 | , | $8,977 | |
159 | Earl Erdman | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $8,901 |
160 | Kayln Johnson | Zap, ND 58580 | $8,857 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”