Farm Subsidy information
Mercer County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Mercer County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 1,520
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mercer County, North Dakota totaled $199,301,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Keith Rodney Unruh | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $210,601 |
162 | Daryn Karges | Hazen, ND 58545 | $206,839 |
163 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $205,417 |
164 | Todd Alan Kisse | Halliday, ND 58636 | $202,140 |
165 | Justin Lee Klein | Hazen, ND 58545 | $201,577 |
166 | Ronald Wanner Estate | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $200,797 |
167 | Ralph Kemmet | Beulah, ND 58523 | $199,272 |
168 | Adron Loy Doerr | Zap, ND 58580 | $199,186 |
169 | Donald Reichenberg | Hazen, ND 58545 | $196,193 |
170 | Eugene Clarence Sailer | Zap, ND 58580 | $194,790 |
171 | Dale Reinhardt | Beulah, ND 58523 | $192,090 |
172 | Clarence K Sayler | Zap, ND 58580 | $186,836 |
173 | Robert Ferebee | Halliday, ND 58636 | $184,777 |
174 | Lee Scheid | Hazen, ND 58545 | $184,672 |
175 | Gerald Wolf | Hazen, ND 58545 | $182,936 |
176 | Wayne Eisenbeis | Beulah, ND 58523 | $182,743 |
177 | Justin Dale Heinle | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $180,280 |
178 | Dave Eric Kraenzel | Hebron, ND 58638 | $178,550 |
179 | Price Farm And Ranch | Stanton, ND 58571 | $177,362 |
180 | Robert Weil | Hazen, ND 58545 | $176,732 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”