Farm Subsidy information
Mercer County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Mercer County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,520
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mercer County, North Dakota totaled $199,301,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ricky Robert Scheid | Hazen, ND 58545 | $2,788,684 |
2 | Gary Gene Knell | Hazen, ND 58545 | $2,466,410 |
3 | Dean Richard Gerving | Mandan, ND 58554 | $2,092,910 |
4 | Tracy Hoherz | Mandan, ND 58554 | $2,015,449 |
5 | Ross Schramm | Hazen, ND 58545 | $1,695,089 |
6 | Gerald Duane Bieber | Beulah, ND 58523 | $1,689,266 |
7 | Glenn Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $1,583,796 |
8 | Rathjen Brothers | Hazen, ND 58545 | $1,561,687 |
9 | Lisa M Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $1,358,598 |
10 | Dean Knell | Hazen, ND 58545 | $1,316,732 |
11 | Gary Scheid | Hazen, ND 58545 | $1,224,084 |
12 | John Joseph Weinand | Hazen, ND 58545 | $1,182,073 |
13 | Richard Charles Scheid | Hazen, ND 58545 | $1,173,443 |
14 | Leroy Leonard Boeckel | Hazen, ND 58545 | $1,153,810 |
15 | Del Ray Galster | Beulah, ND 58523 | $1,094,588 |
16 | Tena Marie Weinand | Hazen, ND 58545 | $1,061,042 |
17 | Troy Gene Sailer | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $1,017,991 |
18 | Kinnischtzke Brothers | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $1,005,669 |
19 | Jeffrey James Ellwein | Hazen, ND 58545 | $930,177 |
20 | Bryan Aalund | Hazen, ND 58545 | $926,428 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>