Farm Subsidy information
Mercer County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Mercer County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 413
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mercer County, North Dakota totaled $13,356,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Union State Bank ** | Hazen, ND 58545 | $406,286 |
| 2 | Glenn Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $270,776 |
| 3 | Farm Credit Services Of Nd ** | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $245,066 |
| 4 | Dean Richard Gerving | Mandan, ND 58554 | $200,277 |
| 5 | Lisa M Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $174,176 |
| 6 | Dean Knell | Hazen, ND 58545 | $170,854 |
| 7 | Unruh Cattle Company | Zap, ND 58580 | $168,810 |
| 8 | Gary Gene Knell | Hazen, ND 58545 | $166,222 |
| 9 | Wolf Grain Farms, Llp | Hazen, ND 58545 | $138,837 |
| 10 | Kim Albert Entze | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $125,222 |
| 11 | Schriefer Ranch LLC | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $123,085 |
| 12 | Starion Financial ** | Mandan, ND 58554 | $121,923 |
| 13 | Adam Wanner | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $121,674 |
| 14 | Matthew Henry Johannes | Underwood, ND 58576 | $120,603 |
| 15 | Kenneth B Entze | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $116,799 |
| 16 | Ricky Robert Scheid | Hazen, ND 58545 | $114,951 |
| 17 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $114,614 |
| 18 | Tracy Hoherz | Mandan, ND 58554 | $109,351 |
| 19 | Troy Gene Sailer | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $106,504 |
| 20 | Dj Erickson | Beulah, ND 58523 | $104,405 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf