Production Flexibility Program in Mercer County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 694
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Mercer County, North Dakota totaled $11,893,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Herbert Zuern | Beulah, ND 58523 | $70,616 |
42 | Robert James Scheid | Hazen, ND 58545 | $69,346 |
43 | Delmer Fred Voegele | Beulah, ND 58523 | $69,265 |
44 | Dorothy Frances Geist | Hazen, ND 58545 | $65,835 |
45 | Benjamin Scheid | Hazen, ND 58545 | $63,648 |
46 | Duane Walz | Beulah, ND 58523 | $62,583 |
47 | Karl Duane Schwartz | Hebron, ND 58638 | $61,581 |
48 | Dale Fisher | Hazen, ND 58545 | $58,748 |
49 | Joel Pfliger | Stanton, ND 58571 | $58,054 |
50 | Orville Oster | Stanton, ND 58571 | $57,681 |
51 | Larry Lynn Flemmer | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $56,551 |
52 | Richard Charles Scheid | Hazen, ND 58545 | $54,969 |
53 | Eugene Clarence Sailer | Zap, ND 58580 | $53,065 |
54 | Marc A Schriefer | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $52,935 |
55 | Lynn Arthur Flemmer | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $51,125 |
56 | Herbert Duane Martin | Mandan, ND 58554 | $50,805 |
57 | Ronald A Isaak | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $50,442 |
58 | Clayton Boeckel | Beulah, ND 58523 | $49,826 |
59 | Melvin Schlender | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $49,809 |
60 | Wayne W Boeshans | Beulah, ND 58523 | $48,612 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”