Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Morton County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 208
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $2,137,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Richard W Duncan | New Salem, ND 58563 | $12,203 |
62 | Kevin M Schmidt | Huff, ND 58554 | $12,196 |
63 | Arthur Arlon Weiss | New Salem, ND 58563 | $12,132 |
64 | Dale Hoger | New Salem, ND 58563 | $12,122 |
65 | Kenneth L Duppong | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $11,656 |
66 | Richard P Fast | New Salem, ND 58563 | $11,515 |
67 | Darrell Jacob Kuhn | New Salem, ND 58563 | $11,491 |
68 | Lance Miller | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $11,466 |
69 | Mark Albin Schafer | Flasher, ND 58535 | $11,443 |
70 | Nola Wynn Schafer | Flasher, ND 58535 | $11,443 |
71 | Vernon D Leingang | Mandan, ND 58554 | $11,420 |
72 | David Guy Wolding | New Salem, ND 58563 | $11,368 |
73 | Russell Willard Bahm | Flasher, ND 58535 | $11,291 |
74 | Shelby Ray Schmidt | Solen, ND 58570 | $10,703 |
75 | Joseph J Lockner | Mandan, ND 58554 | $10,481 |
76 | Marshal Clarys | Olive, MT 59343 | $10,368 |
77 | Dennis J Schmidt | Flasher, ND 58535 | $10,260 |
78 | Kenneth Schmidt | Flasher, ND 58535 | $10,260 |
79 | Aaron John Steckler | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $10,104 |
80 | Daniel Lee Haugen | Mandan, ND 58554 | $10,024 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”