Farm Subsidy information
Morton County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Morton County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 714
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $47,678,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Marcus Knoll | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $125,670 |
62 | Mark Allen Berger | Fort Rice, ND 58554 | $125,620 |
63 | Brandon Clifford Fisher | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $124,241 |
64 | Helbling Bros Ranch | Mandan, ND 58554 | $123,269 |
65 | Joel Edward Bachler | Almont, ND 58520 | $122,400 |
66 | Bradley Albert Schmidt | Flasher, ND 58535 | $122,037 |
67 | Anthony Bachler | Almont, ND 58520 | $120,911 |
68 | Mark Anthony Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $120,668 |
69 | Patrick William Glasser | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $119,634 |
70 | Wayne Braun | New Salem, ND 58563 | $119,514 |
71 | Joel Gartner | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $119,251 |
72 | Daniel Glasser | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $119,141 |
73 | Gerald Schaff | Flasher, ND 58535 | $119,103 |
74 | Jeffrey Schroeder | New Salem, ND 58563 | $118,609 |
75 | Ross Schroeder | New Salem, ND 58563 | $118,596 |
76 | Todd Peterson | New Salem, ND 58563 | $117,177 |
77 | David Guy Wolding | New Salem, ND 58563 | $114,483 |
78 | William Duppong Jr | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $112,981 |
79 | Toby Ryan Olin | New Salem, ND 58563 | $110,118 |
80 | Glenn A Stastny Jr | Mandan, ND 58554 | $109,493 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”