Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Morton County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 355
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $2,477,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Thomas R Schmidt Jr | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $12,355 |
62 | Darby Clifford Fisher | Mandan, ND 58554 | $12,324 |
63 | Roger Gail Hoovestol | Mandan, ND 58554 | $12,146 |
64 | Theodore Adam Morrell | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $11,982 |
65 | Darrell Jacob Kuhn | New Salem, ND 58563 | $11,968 |
66 | Kevin Kunkel | New Salem, ND 58563 | $11,966 |
67 | Jerid Isbell | Flasher, ND 58535 | $11,931 |
68 | Vicki Horst | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $11,575 |
69 | Craig Michael Horst | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $11,575 |
70 | Stanley Boehm | Mandan, ND 58554 | $11,423 |
71 | Jared Lane Schmidt | Solen, ND 58570 | $11,115 |
72 | Braden Allen Wehri | Hebron, ND 58638 | $11,115 |
73 | David Willman | Almont, ND 58520 | $10,784 |
74 | Dwight Keller | Mandan, ND 58554 | $10,672 |
75 | Chester Brandt | Hebron, ND 58638 | $10,350 |
76 | Adam Schantz | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $10,344 |
77 | Darrell Lee Erhardt | Flasher, ND 58535 | $10,316 |
78 | Lee Robert Engelter | New Salem, ND 58563 | $10,179 |
79 | Glenn A Stastny Jr | Mandan, ND 58554 | $10,157 |
80 | Mike C Renner | Mandan, ND 58554 | $10,025 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”