Deficiency Payment in Morton County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 703
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $609,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Michael Joseph Ferderer | Mandan, ND 58554 | $2,264 |
62 | Kevin D Nelson | Mandan, ND 58554 | $2,263 |
63 | Terry Nelson | Mandan, ND 58554 | $2,263 |
64 | Lester C Feland | Almont, ND 58520 | $2,227 |
65 | Robert Engelter | New Salem, ND 58563 | $2,209 |
66 | Wilbert Kunz | New Salem, ND 58563 | $2,195 |
67 | Nels Hagerott | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $2,164 |
68 | Michael Duppong | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $2,151 |
69 | Kevin Michael Schantz | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $2,151 |
70 | Peter Gietzen | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $2,136 |
71 | Jeffrey Schroeder | New Salem, ND 58563 | $2,131 |
72 | Dale Allen Neidhardt | New Salem, ND 58563 | $2,125 |
73 | Lloyd George Rossow | Flasher, ND 58535 | $2,090 |
74 | Clifford Carl Rossow | Flasher, ND 58535 | $2,090 |
75 | Steckler Ranch Inc | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $2,084 |
76 | James David Wanner | Hebron, ND 58638 | $2,083 |
77 | Jos A Vogel Jr | Mandan, ND 58554 | $2,071 |
78 | Joseph A Vogel III | Mandan, ND 58554 | $2,071 |
79 | Kenton Walter Holle | Mandan, ND 58554 | $2,029 |
80 | Wayne Willard Gifford Jr | Flasher, ND 58535 | $2,025 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”