Total Disaster Programs in Morton County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,481
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $88,373,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ross Schroeder | New Salem, ND 58563 | $291,500 |
62 | William Duppong Jr | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $288,259 |
63 | Mike J Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $287,682 |
64 | Clyde F Kraenzel | Hebron, ND 58638 | $285,460 |
65 | Roger Schantz | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $282,122 |
66 | Leonard Joseph Heinert | Solen, ND 58570 | $281,018 |
67 | Darby Clifford Fisher | Mandan, ND 58554 | $280,242 |
68 | Jason Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $280,192 |
69 | Ronnie Ralph Fisher | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $279,853 |
70 | David A Ferderer | Mandan, ND 58554 | $279,231 |
71 | Dale Craig Heinle | Hebron, ND 58638 | $279,216 |
72 | Donald R Wanner | Hebron, ND 58638 | $276,552 |
73 | Renee Ione Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $276,210 |
74 | Todd Peterson | New Salem, ND 58563 | $273,850 |
75 | Ellingson Ranch Inc | St Anthony, ND 58566 | $273,362 |
76 | Gerald Schaff | Flasher, ND 58535 | $272,205 |
77 | Terrance James Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $266,148 |
78 | Hogerville Dairy Llp | New Salem, ND 58563 | $264,892 |
79 | Vicki Horst | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $262,541 |
80 | Terrance Duppong | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $261,848 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”