Total Emergency Relief Program in Morton County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 367
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $21,009,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Todd Peterson | New Salem, ND 58563 | $102,184 |
62 | Marcus Knoll | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $101,946 |
63 | Rodney Warren Rusch | New Salem, ND 58563 | $101,130 |
64 | Patrick William Glasser | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $98,231 |
65 | Robert John Slavick | New Salem, ND 58563 | $97,901 |
66 | Dale Eugene Peterson | Almont, ND 58520 | $97,886 |
67 | Daniel Glasser | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $97,765 |
68 | Mark Anthony Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $97,428 |
69 | Anthony Bachler | Almont, ND 58520 | $96,857 |
70 | Orval Paul Schlenvogt | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $96,807 |
71 | Joel Edward Bachler | Almont, ND 58520 | $96,712 |
72 | Derrick Rusch | New Salem, ND 58563 | $95,899 |
73 | Richard W Duncan | New Salem, ND 58563 | $91,275 |
74 | Albert Curtis Heinert | Solen, ND 58570 | $90,785 |
75 | David Guy Wolding | New Salem, ND 58563 | $90,362 |
76 | Russell Allen Hoesel | New Salem, ND 58563 | $89,992 |
77 | M Curtis Feland | Almont, ND 58520 | $89,966 |
78 | Dallas Wayne Miller | New Salem, ND 58563 | $89,221 |
79 | Steven Dale Schmidt | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $88,565 |
80 | Fredrick J Berger | Mandan, ND 58554 | $88,184 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”