Loan Deficiency in Morton County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 881
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $22,946,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Leonard Joseph Heinert | Solen, ND 58570 | $101,323 |
62 | Thomas Zander | Mandan, ND 58554 | $98,134 |
63 | Lyle Victor Kinnischtzke | Mandan, ND 58554 | $97,649 |
64 | Richard C Tokach | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $96,845 |
65 | James Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $95,241 |
66 | John R Hatzenbuhler | Mandan, ND 58554 | $93,528 |
67 | Keith W Norton | New Salem, ND 58563 | $92,930 |
68 | Doll Farm Enterprises | New Salem, ND 58563 | $92,434 |
69 | Allen Sayler | Hebron, ND 58638 | $88,978 |
70 | Joseph Daniel Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $85,051 |
71 | Ronald Kovar | Flasher, ND 58535 | $84,103 |
72 | Rodney Lee Kinnischtzke | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $80,919 |
73 | Darrell Lee Erhardt | Flasher, ND 58535 | $79,489 |
74 | Doll & Pazdernik | Mandan, ND 58554 | $78,140 |
75 | Russell Allen Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $77,059 |
76 | Melvin James Hertz | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $76,985 |
77 | Kevin Michael Schantz | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $76,947 |
78 | Kenyon Opp | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $76,191 |
79 | Joshua Lynn Gartner | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $74,393 |
80 | Eddie Wetzel | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $73,918 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”