Market Gains in Morton County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 159
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $767,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gary Schantz | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $2,803 |
62 | Lisa M Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $2,795 |
63 | Roger Schantz | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $2,712 |
64 | Larry Martin Mosbrucker | New Salem, ND 58563 | $2,662 |
65 | Jimmie Bechhold | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $2,651 |
66 | Greg Kitzan | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $2,569 |
67 | Roger L Monson | Flasher, ND 58535 | $2,556 |
68 | Kevin Michael Opp | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $2,522 |
69 | Kenneth A Schmidt | Solen, ND 58570 | $2,382 |
70 | Jason Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $2,364 |
71 | Donald Wetzel | New Salem, ND 58563 | $2,153 |
72 | James Edward Thiel | Almont, ND 58520 | $2,115 |
73 | Lionel Ralph Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $2,114 |
74 | Allen Robert Weiss | New Salem, ND 58563 | $1,920 |
75 | Karyl Walter Kinnischtzke | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $1,874 |
76 | Norman Peter Fleck | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $1,837 |
77 | Leslie Schantz | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $1,837 |
78 | James Valentine Schaaf | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $1,732 |
79 | Edwin C Richter Estate | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $1,708 |
80 | Vicki Lynn Opp | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $1,681 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”