Production Flexibility Program in Morton County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,080
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $22,370,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mark Albin Schafer | Flasher, ND 58535 | $74,043 |
62 | Ross Schroeder | New Salem, ND 58563 | $73,259 |
63 | Karyl Walter Kinnischtzke | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $72,836 |
64 | Kevin Thompson | Almont, ND 58520 | $72,758 |
65 | Claye Kenneth Kaelberer | New Salem, ND 58563 | $71,817 |
66 | Jerry Vincent Kuntz | Hebron, ND 58638 | $71,702 |
67 | Marvin A Boehm | Mandan, ND 58554 | $71,526 |
68 | Kevin Leo Miller | Flasher, ND 58535 | $71,432 |
69 | Richard D Duncan | New Salem, ND 58563 | $71,430 |
70 | Kenneth L Duppong | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $70,478 |
71 | Darrell Lee Erhardt | Flasher, ND 58535 | $69,744 |
72 | Keith Gietzen | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $69,614 |
73 | Robert John Herz | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $69,577 |
74 | David Wanner | Hebron, ND 58638 | $69,056 |
75 | Anton Joseph Kalvoda Jr | Mandan, ND 58554 | $68,316 |
76 | Marlene Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $68,278 |
77 | Ernest Seeman | Mandan, ND 58554 | $68,248 |
78 | Richard Michael Schirado | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $68,061 |
79 | Eric Schultz | Almont, ND 58520 | $66,386 |
80 | James M Friesz | Mandan, ND 58554 | $65,419 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”