Total Commodity Programs in Morton County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,919
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $177,090,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Alan Duane Miller | Mandan, ND 58554 | $572,120 |
62 | Kevin Michael Schantz | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $555,363 |
63 | Brenda K Meyer | Flasher, ND 58535 | $549,497 |
64 | Rudolph Ervin Peltz | New Salem, ND 58563 | $545,478 |
65 | Lance Miller | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $544,027 |
66 | Dale Eugene Peterson | Almont, ND 58520 | $543,925 |
67 | Michael J Schaaf | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $542,363 |
68 | Douglas Raymond Schmidt | Solen, ND 58570 | $531,989 |
69 | James Carlton Schaaf | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $528,962 |
70 | Bank Of Glen Ullin ** | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $528,943 |
71 | David A Meyer | Flasher, ND 58535 | $528,109 |
72 | Starion Financial ** | Mandan, ND 58554 | $519,516 |
73 | Arden Hagerott | Mandan, ND 58554 | $513,957 |
74 | Richard C Tokach | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $507,155 |
75 | Todd Peterson | New Salem, ND 58563 | $505,120 |
76 | William Anthony Meuchel | New Salem, ND 58563 | $495,101 |
77 | Jade Leroy Friesz | Flasher, ND 58535 | $487,838 |
78 | Renee Ione Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $482,974 |
79 | David A Ferderer | Mandan, ND 58554 | $482,768 |
80 | Jeffrey Jon Heinle | Hebron, ND 58638 | $480,025 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”