Total Disaster Programs in Morton County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 604
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $27,438,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Terry Schlatter | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $78,071 |
122 | Aaron John Steckler | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $77,624 |
123 | Bryan Erwin Thiel | Almont, ND 58520 | $76,682 |
124 | Bradley Edward Thiel | Almont, ND 58520 | $76,682 |
125 | August Joseph Schaaf | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $76,637 |
126 | Timothy Lee Johnson & | Mandan, ND 58554 | $75,913 |
127 | Russell A Graner | Huff, ND 58554 | $75,719 |
128 | Sherwood Schmidt | Flasher, ND 58535 | $75,674 |
129 | Jeff Walter Vogel | Mandan, ND 58554 | $75,186 |
130 | Dennis Gustin | Mandan, ND 58554 | $74,908 |
131 | Jeremy Clayton Kilen | New Salem, ND 58563 | $72,918 |
132 | Robert John Herz | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $72,007 |
133 | Daniel Lee Haugen | Mandan, ND 58554 | $71,958 |
134 | Kevin Michael Schantz | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $71,447 |
135 | Lance A Gartner | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $71,212 |
136 | Valerie Schaaf | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $70,768 |
137 | Larry Wetzel | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $70,490 |
138 | Bryce Leland Allen | New Salem, ND 58563 | $70,366 |
139 | Terrance Duppong | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $68,847 |
140 | Ty Duppong | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $68,782 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”