Loan Deficiency in Morton County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 881
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $22,946,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Roger Schantz | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $136,052 |
42 | Peltz Revocable Living Trust | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $136,025 |
43 | Richard Michael Schirado | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $134,237 |
44 | Archie Jerome Wanner | Hebron, ND 58638 | $126,732 |
45 | Douglas Gordon Horst | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $126,055 |
46 | Vicki Lynn Opp | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $125,931 |
47 | Craig Michael Horst | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $125,725 |
48 | Jeffrey Schroeder | New Salem, ND 58563 | $122,452 |
49 | Ross Schroeder | New Salem, ND 58563 | $122,105 |
50 | Gary Lee Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $122,084 |
51 | Mike J Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $118,921 |
52 | James Valentine Schaaf | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $118,168 |
53 | David Michael Schaaf | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $117,677 |
54 | Ernest Seeman | Mandan, ND 58554 | $110,403 |
55 | Mark Anthony Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $110,392 |
56 | David Wanner | Hebron, ND 58638 | $109,234 |
57 | Wayne Braun | New Salem, ND 58563 | $107,611 |
58 | James David Wanner | Hebron, ND 58638 | $104,520 |
59 | Lionel Ralph Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $103,603 |
60 | Annette Helen Heinert | Solen, ND 58570 | $101,323 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”