Production Flexibility Program in Morton County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,080
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $22,370,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David Michael Schaaf | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $92,981 |
42 | Lisa M Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $91,372 |
43 | Larry Laubner | Mandan, ND 58554 | $90,166 |
44 | Lyle Victor Kinnischtzke | Mandan, ND 58554 | $90,026 |
45 | Craig Leonard Heinert | Mandan, ND 58554 | $89,706 |
46 | Wayne Braun | New Salem, ND 58563 | $89,672 |
47 | Archie Jerome Wanner | Hebron, ND 58638 | $89,515 |
48 | Dennis Jerome Renner | Mandan, ND 58554 | $87,804 |
49 | Matt Doll Estate | Mandan, ND 58554 | $86,226 |
50 | Wilbert Lee Fisher Jr | Mandan, ND 58554 | $86,200 |
51 | Bryan Russell Hoesel | New Salem, ND 58563 | $85,553 |
52 | Terrance D Wilkens | New Salem, ND 58563 | $85,236 |
53 | Michael Allen Gartner | Mandan, ND 58554 | $83,000 |
54 | Keith W Norton | New Salem, ND 58563 | $80,534 |
55 | Beierlein Brothers | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $77,156 |
56 | Martin Schaff | Mandan, ND 58554 | $76,507 |
57 | Kevin Michael Schantz | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $76,386 |
58 | Albert G Kovash | Mandan, ND 58554 | $75,969 |
59 | Rodney Lee Kinnischtzke | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $75,293 |
60 | Jeffrey Schroeder | New Salem, ND 58563 | $74,579 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”