Total Commodity Programs in Morton County, North Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 774
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $30,805,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Donald R Wanner | Hebron, ND 58638 | $197,363 |
22 | Michael Wayne Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $196,442 |
23 | Bryan Russell Hoesel | New Salem, ND 58563 | $195,216 |
24 | Miles John Schantz | Hebron, ND 58638 | $194,576 |
25 | Beierlein Brothers | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $192,253 |
26 | Larry Laubner | Mandan, ND 58554 | $181,140 |
27 | Jason Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $177,376 |
28 | Blaine Hopfauf | Mandan, ND 58554 | $171,086 |
29 | Bradley Albert Schmidt | Flasher, ND 58535 | $170,747 |
30 | Lance Eugene Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $168,514 |
31 | Renee Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $168,217 |
32 | David Guy Wolding | New Salem, ND 58563 | $160,864 |
33 | Chester M Schantz | Hebron, ND 58638 | $157,301 |
34 | Donald James Hatzenbuhler | Solen, ND 58570 | $151,085 |
35 | Douglas Raymond Schmidt | Solen, ND 58570 | $149,973 |
36 | Archie Jerome Wanner | Hebron, ND 58638 | $149,592 |
37 | Kelly Schaff | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $148,219 |
38 | Sweet River Company LLC | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $142,669 |
39 | Travis T Wilkens | New Salem, ND 58563 | $141,282 |
40 | Stephen Wilbert Berger | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $138,774 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”