Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Mountrail County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 244
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Mountrail County, North Dakota totaled $2,841,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Thomas Bieri | Blaisdell, ND 58718 | $15,090 |
62 | William Ruland | New Town, ND 58763 | $14,976 |
63 | Benedict Waldock | Parshall, ND 58770 | $14,661 |
64 | Terence Ortloff | Ross, ND 58776 | $14,224 |
65 | Kevin Jerome Craft | Stanley, ND 58784 | $13,808 |
66 | Jeffrey A Lapica | Ross, ND 58776 | $13,302 |
67 | James Carter | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $13,208 |
68 | Mark Uran | Stanley, ND 58784 | $12,960 |
69 | Michael Littlefield | New Town, ND 58763 | $12,712 |
70 | Steven Littlefield | New Town, ND 58763 | $12,712 |
71 | Brian Uran | Ross, ND 58776 | $12,708 |
72 | Jacob Niemitalo | Stanley, ND 58784 | $12,377 |
73 | Michael Crider | Donnybrook, ND 58734 | $12,200 |
74 | Richard Bolen | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $12,166 |
75 | Lee Meiers | Stanley, ND 58784 | $12,123 |
76 | Jenna Waldock | Parshall, ND 58770 | $11,983 |
77 | Bradley Nesheim | New Town, ND 58763 | $11,869 |
78 | Boyd A Anderson | White Earth, ND 58794 | $11,734 |
79 | Arlan J Anderson | Tioga, ND 58852 | $11,734 |
80 | Jeremy Rawden | Mina, SD 57451 | $11,714 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”