Market Loss Assistance Program in Mountrail County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,554
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Mountrail County, North Dakota totaled $17,912,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Tco Inc | Stanley, ND 58784 | $59,663 |
62 | Beauty Valley Farms Inc | Williston, ND 58801 | $59,617 |
63 | Richard Dennis Osness Est | Minot, ND 58701 | $59,513 |
64 | John D Sauber | Mandan, ND 58554 | $59,497 |
65 | Kenton Onstad | Parshall, ND 58770 | $59,490 |
66 | Robert Arvid Erickson | Plaza, ND 58771 | $59,361 |
67 | Mylo Wolding | New Town, ND 58763 | $59,303 |
68 | Rodney Wayne Iverson | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $58,726 |
69 | John Romaine Hanzal | Parshall, ND 58770 | $58,716 |
70 | Zacher Family Farm Inc | Parshall, ND 58770 | $58,631 |
71 | Wade F Williamson | Parshall, ND 58770 | $58,240 |
72 | Donald Edward Gregoire | Donnybrook, ND 58734 | $58,119 |
73 | Robert Virgil Andes Jr | Parshall, ND 58770 | $57,695 |
74 | Kenneth Littlefield | New Town, ND 58763 | $57,222 |
75 | Ricky V Lee | Plaza, ND 58771 | $56,733 |
76 | M & G Schenfisch Inc | Makoti, ND 58756 | $56,538 |
77 | Duane George Risan | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $56,278 |
78 | Bernard Frank Wright | Stanley, ND 58784 | $56,142 |
79 | Wejco Farm Inc | Stanley, ND 58784 | $56,066 |
80 | Wayne Lynn Johnson | Palermo, ND 58769 | $55,954 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”