Conservation Reserve Program in Mountrail County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,215
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Mountrail County, North Dakota totaled $43,729,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | David L Nelson | Minot, ND 58703 | $90,259 |
122 | Donald P Nelson | Minot, ND 58701 | $89,026 |
123 | W Timothy Nelson | Minot, ND 58701 | $88,981 |
124 | Christian Oynes | Anaheim, CA 92804 | $88,759 |
125 | Betty Wollschlager | Parshall, ND 58770 | $88,628 |
126 | Scott Anthony Bredahl | Berthold, ND 58718 | $88,324 |
127 | E L Will Trust | Stanley, ND 58784 | $88,063 |
128 | Leslie Alvstad | Stanley, ND 58784 | $87,958 |
129 | Clifford E Larson | Minot, ND 58701 | $87,941 |
130 | Jerry Robert Wurtz | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $86,894 |
131 | Ruby J Kvamme | Rogue River, OR 97537 | $86,455 |
132 | Willard Hanson | White Earth, ND 58794 | $86,090 |
133 | Michael Steven Hynek | Stanley, ND 58784 | $85,988 |
134 | John Moen | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $85,679 |
135 | Holmco | Saint Paul, MN 55126 | $84,731 |
136 | Steven Bigelow | Makoti, ND 58756 | $84,642 |
137 | Ernest Bernard Howell | Berthold, ND 58718 | $84,247 |
138 | Jay Chamley | Reno, NV 89523 | $83,499 |
139 | Evon Moen | Kalispell, MT 59901 | $83,343 |
140 | Argyle Helland | Stanley, ND 58784 | $83,236 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”