Farm Subsidy information
Nelson County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Nelson County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 653
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Nelson County, North Dakota totaled $35,174,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Matthew Peter Hillesland | Aneta, ND 58212 | $176,348 |
22 | Michael Allan Anderson | Michigan, ND 58259 | $171,997 |
23 | Jonathan Wade Varnson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $167,871 |
24 | Shane Flaagan | Tolna, ND 58380 | $164,201 |
25 | Christopher Ryan Hoffmann | Michigan, ND 58259 | $162,206 |
26 | Kevin Michael Landeis | Michigan, ND 58259 | $161,898 |
27 | David Wayne Thompson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $161,449 |
28 | Allan Lee Anderson | Michigan, ND 58259 | $160,546 |
29 | Matthew Nelson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $154,778 |
30 | Brian A Schmidt | Lakota, ND 58344 | $150,688 |
31 | Tanner Brueckner | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $148,906 |
32 | Michael Kelly | Niagara, ND 58266 | $148,688 |
33 | Robert Lloyd Cookman | Lakota, ND 58344 | $142,347 |
34 | Todd Jorde | Tolna, ND 58380 | $141,643 |
35 | Mark Philip Peterson | Aneta, ND 58212 | $139,148 |
36 | Wade Myron Halvorson | Tolna, ND 58380 | $137,238 |
37 | Troy Maynard Lillehaugen | Michigan, ND 58259 | $135,254 |
38 | Lisbeth Welte Brueckner-eales | Niagara, ND 58266 | $132,249 |
39 | Michael Wayne Luehring | Pekin, ND 58361 | $132,118 |
40 | Ardell James Brueckner | Niagara, ND 58266 | $132,045 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”