Conservation Reserve Program in Nelson County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 397
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Nelson County, North Dakota totaled $2,536,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gordon O Munns | Stacy, MN 55079 | $22,052 |
22 | Allan Lee Anderson | Michigan, ND 58259 | $21,595 |
23 | Ann M Munns | Lompoc, CA 93436 | $21,429 |
24 | Albert T Shirek | Roosevelt, MN 56673 | $21,060 |
25 | Marian Swingdoff | Fargo, ND 58104 | $21,027 |
26 | George W Hildre Revocable Trust | Bella Vista, AR 72715 | $19,870 |
27 | Charles A Ryba | Lakota, ND 58344 | $19,691 |
28 | , | $19,013 | |
29 | Vicki D Yoney | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $18,812 |
30 | Forde Family Revocable Trust | Tolna, ND 58380 | $18,768 |
31 | Paul C Shirek | Michigan, ND 58259 | $18,629 |
32 | , | $18,550 | |
33 | Terrence Lynn Luehring | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $18,379 |
34 | Gordon Wayne Thompson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $17,872 |
35 | Ophaug Family Trust | Staples, MN 56470 | $17,820 |
36 | Lars L Borgen Estate | Grand Forks, ND 58203 | $17,802 |
37 | Mavis C Anderson Estate | Valley City, ND 58072 | $17,060 |
38 | Curtis Owen Twete | Mcville, ND 58254 | $16,393 |
39 | Brian Lee Luehring | Tolna, ND 58380 | $16,203 |
40 | Darlene Lofthus | Woodbury, MN 55125 | $16,015 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”