Production Flexibility Program in Nelson County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,014
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Nelson County, North Dakota totaled $33,223,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John Peter Steffan | Michigan, ND 58259 | $172,855 |
42 | Gary Alden Mork | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $168,983 |
43 | David Ronald Macmillan | Mcville, ND 58254 | $167,109 |
44 | Altendorf Farms | Mcville, ND 58254 | $166,048 |
45 | David Joseph Steffan | Michigan, ND 58259 | $165,561 |
46 | David Wayne Thompson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $163,032 |
47 | Shane Flaagan | Tolna, ND 58380 | $161,537 |
48 | Steven N Twete | Pekin, ND 58361 | $159,313 |
49 | Merle Rainsberry | East Grand Forks, MN 56721 | $159,279 |
50 | Lakota Ranch Company | Lakota, ND 58344 | $154,338 |
51 | Clayton Ward | Mcville, ND 58254 | $151,573 |
52 | Allan Lee Anderson | Michigan, ND 58259 | $151,448 |
53 | Gillett Brothers Jv | Tolna, ND 58380 | $151,182 |
54 | Mark Philip Peterson | Aneta, ND 58212 | $150,569 |
55 | Robert James Franzen | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $150,478 |
56 | Vicki Lee Schindele | Lakota, ND 58344 | $149,823 |
57 | David Lee Schindele | Lakota, ND 58344 | $149,820 |
58 | Mark Allen Slotto | Lakota, ND 58344 | $149,584 |
59 | Dale Darrell Flohaug | Aneta, ND 58212 | $146,978 |
60 | Gail Karen Flohaug | Aneta, ND 58212 | $146,974 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”