Conservation Reserve Program in Nelson County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,609
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Nelson County, North Dakota totaled $103,418,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Lars L Borgen Estate | Grand Forks, ND 58203 | $263,943 |
82 | Sydney Haas | Tolna, ND 58380 | $262,749 |
83 | Alex Hager | Michigan, ND 58259 | $261,539 |
84 | Daniel Shirek | Michigan, ND 58259 | $261,303 |
85 | Michael Olson | Mcville, ND 58254 | $260,977 |
86 | O'neal B Johnson | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $259,658 |
87 | Alice R Carlson | New York, NY 10017 | $257,180 |
88 | Norman H Pederson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $256,036 |
89 | John Peter Steffan | Michigan, ND 58259 | $255,743 |
90 | Leland Gordon Ophaug | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $245,030 |
91 | John H Schmidt | Michigan, ND 58259 | $244,737 |
92 | Ardell Tweed | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $241,866 |
93 | Harris Forde | Tolna, ND 58380 | $240,071 |
94 | Philip James Sandford | Michigan, ND 58259 | $239,615 |
95 | Raymond L Hanson | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $237,944 |
96 | Brian Lee Luehring | Tolna, ND 58380 | $235,777 |
97 | Arnold G Sundquist | Aneta, ND 58212 | $233,273 |
98 | Gunhild Schmidt | Lakota, ND 58344 | $232,536 |
99 | Palmer Eugene Schmidt | Niagara, ND 58266 | $229,818 |
100 | Robert Brent Loe | Mcville, ND 58254 | $229,645 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”