Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Nelson County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 605
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Nelson County, North Dakota totaled $18,850,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Brian Daniel Halvorson | Pekin, ND 58361 | $68,009 |
102 | Keith Forde | Tolna, ND 58380 | $67,884 |
103 | Clayton Ward | Mcville, ND 58254 | $67,182 |
104 | Timothy James Haakenson | Aneta, ND 58212 | $66,977 |
105 | Michael Duane Schindele | Tolna, ND 58380 | $66,947 |
106 | Clayton William Heck | Tolna, ND 58380 | $63,528 |
107 | Joel David Heck | Pekin, ND 58361 | $63,528 |
108 | Berthal John Elgin | Lakota, ND 58344 | $62,685 |
109 | Dustin Michael Yoney | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $61,933 |
110 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $61,580 |
111 | Harold Haabak | Mcville, ND 58254 | $61,191 |
112 | Dan L Rorvig | Mcville, ND 58254 | $60,848 |
113 | Randy Wayne Miller | Lakota, ND 58344 | $60,819 |
114 | Clinton Linstad | Park River, ND 58270 | $60,582 |
115 | Loren Scott Swenson | Aneta, ND 58212 | $59,743 |
116 | Marland Lane Tweed | Pekin, ND 58361 | $59,337 |
117 | Troy Maynard Lillehaugen | Michigan, ND 58259 | $58,810 |
118 | Gregory Hildremyr | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $56,818 |
119 | Lee Kenneth Dahl | Lakota, ND 58344 | $56,156 |
120 | John Bondy | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $55,841 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”