Conservation Reserve Program in Nelson County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,609
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Nelson County, North Dakota totaled $103,418,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Don Loe | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $211,791 |
122 | Lyle Koski | Lakota, ND 58344 | $208,796 |
123 | David Aaser | Mcville, ND 58254 | $206,556 |
124 | Lee Williams | Tolna, ND 58380 | $204,931 |
125 | Rose Pic | Whitman, ND 58259 | $201,146 |
126 | Pat Williams | Tolna, ND 58380 | $200,854 |
127 | Wayne Skalicky | East Grand Forks, MN 56721 | $199,900 |
128 | Gerald E Meyer | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $198,982 |
129 | David Ronald Macmillan | Mcville, ND 58254 | $198,659 |
130 | Rose Anderson | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $198,078 |
131 | Rhonda Wall | Lakota, ND 58344 | $197,212 |
132 | Thorsen Brothers Farm Partnership | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $195,821 |
133 | Ardell Knudson | Rapid City, SD 57701 | $195,412 |
134 | Vivian Ringdahl | Mcville, ND 58254 | $195,103 |
135 | Judith Marie Miller | Lawton, ND 58345 | $194,410 |
136 | Dorothy Yule Hauck | Utica, SD 57067 | $192,413 |
137 | David Wayne Thompson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $191,350 |
138 | Ophaug Family Trust | Staples, MN 56470 | $191,324 |
139 | Lee Hanson | Riverton, WY 82501 | $190,516 |
140 | Shirley L Haas | Washburn, ND 58577 | $186,794 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”