Market Loss Assistance Program in Nelson County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 835
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Nelson County, North Dakota totaled $16,186,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Richard D Carlson | Fordville, ND 58231 | $38,517 |
142 | Richard Leo Danda | Michigan, ND 58259 | $38,339 |
143 | Allen William Danda | Michigan, ND 58259 | $38,339 |
144 | David Wayne Larson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $37,608 |
145 | Lloyd Sydney Lee | Tolna, ND 58380 | $37,285 |
146 | David Earl Lee | Tolna, ND 58380 | $37,283 |
147 | Kent Allan Hejlik | Lakota, ND 58344 | $36,896 |
148 | Darlene Nelson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $36,890 |
149 | Gordon Nelson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $36,890 |
150 | John Peter Sundquist | Aneta, ND 58212 | $36,447 |
151 | Terry Allen Tennison | Fordville, ND 58231 | $36,099 |
152 | Todd Stanley Whitman | Aneta, ND 58212 | $35,877 |
153 | Clinton Linstad | Park River, ND 58270 | $35,722 |
154 | Kevin Michael Landeis | Michigan, ND 58259 | $35,715 |
155 | Dwight Haas | Tolna, ND 58380 | $35,187 |
156 | Thomas Leroy Riely | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $35,094 |
157 | Richard Elgin | Lakota, ND 58344 | $34,609 |
158 | Arlan Dahlen | Dahlen, ND 58224 | $34,151 |
159 | Kelly Farms Inc | Niagara, ND 58266 | $33,899 |
160 | Terrance Kenneth Estvold | Lakota, ND 58344 | $33,282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”