Farm Subsidy information
Nelson County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Nelson County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,486
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Nelson County, North Dakota totaled $510,320,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wheeler Bros | Lakota, ND 58344 | $3,295,056 |
2 | Scott Gordon Nelson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $2,497,116 |
3 | Faye Brosy Nelson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $2,437,100 |
4 | David Wayne Thompson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $2,248,027 |
5 | Forde Kuchar Farms Inc | Michigan, ND 58259 | $2,242,969 |
6 | Leroy Sparks | Michigan, ND 58259 | $2,198,938 |
7 | Kim Willis Swenson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $2,134,886 |
8 | First United Bank ** | Park River, ND 58270 | $2,132,003 |
9 | Michael W Yoney | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $2,073,998 |
10 | John Peter Steffan | Michigan, ND 58259 | $2,065,147 |
11 | Allen Russell Ternquist | Michigan, ND 58259 | $2,037,957 |
12 | David Hillesland | Aneta, ND 58212 | $1,949,481 |
13 | Glenn Fossen | Lakota, ND 58344 | $1,947,997 |
14 | Timothy James Haakenson | Aneta, ND 58212 | $1,943,308 |
15 | Randy Schaley | Niagara, ND 58266 | $1,830,928 |
16 | Gillett Brothers Jv | Tolna, ND 58380 | $1,828,324 |
17 | Jeanne Schaley | Niagara, ND 58266 | $1,822,730 |
18 | Robert K Lindvall | Mcville, ND 58254 | $1,801,326 |
19 | Mark Philip Peterson | Aneta, ND 58212 | $1,800,829 |
20 | Dennis/rebecca Anderson Jv | Lakota, ND 58344 | $1,782,335 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>