Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Nelson County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 331
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Nelson County, North Dakota totaled $11,857,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Michael W Yoney | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $106,629 |
22 | Joshua David Sateren | Mcville, ND 58254 | $105,428 |
23 | Wheeler Bros | Lakota, ND 58344 | $104,896 |
24 | Charles Douglas Stein | Mcville, ND 58254 | $101,067 |
25 | Matthew Nelson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $99,590 |
26 | Matthew Aaron Henke | Mcville, ND 58254 | $99,278 |
27 | Kim Willis Swenson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $99,089 |
28 | John Peter Steffan | Michigan, ND 58259 | $98,949 |
29 | Michael A Haugland | Lakota, ND 58344 | $96,294 |
30 | Richard James Hamel | Lakota, ND 58344 | $93,801 |
31 | Matthew Lewis Franzen | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $93,309 |
32 | Sylvia Kaye Daws | Michigan, ND 58259 | $91,639 |
33 | Don A Hillesland | Aneta, ND 58212 | $91,589 |
34 | Shane Flaagan | Tolna, ND 58380 | $91,353 |
35 | David Hillesland | Aneta, ND 58212 | $89,838 |
36 | Carl W Jensen | Pekin, ND 58361 | $88,915 |
37 | Ardell James Brueckner | Niagara, ND 58266 | $86,270 |
38 | Robert Martin Landeis | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $86,073 |
39 | David Joel Daws | Michigan, ND 58259 | $85,111 |
40 | Lanny Klefstad | Pekin, ND 58361 | $83,720 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”