Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Nelson County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 201
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Nelson County, North Dakota totaled $4,808,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | First United Bank ** | Park River, ND 58270 | $413,854 |
2 | Reiten Farms | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $192,102 |
3 | Johnson Boys Farms Llp | Lakota, ND 58344 | $170,191 |
4 | Central Plains Ag Services LLC | Hannaford, ND 58448 | $122,791 |
5 | Forde Kuchar Farms Inc | Michigan, ND 58259 | $122,173 |
6 | Timothy James Haakenson | Aneta, ND 58212 | $117,513 |
7 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $117,167 |
8 | Michael A Haugland | Lakota, ND 58344 | $109,846 |
9 | Nathan Fisher | Northwood, ND 58267 | $107,666 |
10 | Brandon Ward Galde | Hatton, ND 58240 | $87,686 |
11 | Scott Gordon Nelson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $85,513 |
12 | Faye Brosy Nelson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $85,513 |
13 | Matthew Nelson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $84,007 |
14 | Wheeler Bros | Lakota, ND 58344 | $81,689 |
15 | Jonathan Wade Varnson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $79,573 |
16 | E&m Farms | Niagara, ND 58266 | $72,911 |
17 | Robert Martin Landeis | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $71,570 |
18 | Richard James Hamel | Lakota, ND 58344 | $63,639 |
19 | Matt Locken | Pekin, ND 58361 | $62,904 |
20 | Kent Allan Hejlik | Lakota, ND 58344 | $62,493 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>