Market Gains in Nelson County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 201
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Nelson County, North Dakota totaled $1,102,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ross Michael Messner | Pekin, ND 58361 | $50,841 |
2 | Michael W Yoney | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $48,771 |
3 | Scott Gordon Nelson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $42,379 |
4 | Faye Brosy Nelson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $42,379 |
5 | Douglas Vernon Stein | Mcville, ND 58254 | $37,236 |
6 | Marilyn Joan Stein | Mcville, ND 58254 | $37,236 |
7 | Rodney Balzer Brossart | Lakota, ND 58344 | $36,435 |
8 | Kim Willis Swenson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $35,489 |
9 | Allen Russell Ternquist | Michigan, ND 58259 | $25,522 |
10 | John Wayne Franzen | Lakota, ND 58344 | $25,260 |
11 | Mark Philip Peterson | Aneta, ND 58212 | $23,649 |
12 | Lakota Ranch Company | Lakota, ND 58344 | $23,220 |
13 | Thomas Mikal Snortland | Sharon, ND 58277 | $23,220 |
14 | David Lee Schindele | Lakota, ND 58344 | $18,673 |
15 | Vicki Lee Schindele | Lakota, ND 58344 | $18,673 |
16 | Robert K Lindvall | Mcville, ND 58254 | $16,273 |
17 | Dwight Raymond Beck | Michigan, ND 58259 | $15,492 |
18 | Michael Wayne Luehring | Pekin, ND 58361 | $14,661 |
19 | Jehovah-jireh Honey Farms Inc | Lakota, ND 58344 | $13,607 |
20 | Philip James Sandford | Michigan, ND 58259 | $13,088 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>