Total Commodity Programs in Nelson County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,706
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Nelson County, North Dakota totaled $197,330,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wheeler Bros | Lakota, ND 58344 | $2,115,922 |
2 | Faye Brosy Nelson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $1,903,459 |
3 | Scott Gordon Nelson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $1,903,447 |
4 | Allen Russell Ternquist | Michigan, ND 58259 | $1,809,817 |
5 | Forde Kuchar Farms Inc | Michigan, ND 58259 | $1,722,614 |
6 | David Wayne Thompson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $1,713,860 |
7 | First United Bank ** | Park River, ND 58270 | $1,700,527 |
8 | Kim Willis Swenson | Lakota, ND 58344 | $1,696,829 |
9 | Mark Philip Peterson | Aneta, ND 58212 | $1,654,407 |
10 | Robert K Lindvall | Mcville, ND 58254 | $1,606,675 |
11 | John Peter Steffan | Michigan, ND 58259 | $1,564,708 |
12 | Gillett Brothers Jv | Tolna, ND 58380 | $1,543,405 |
13 | Glenn Fossen | Lakota, ND 58344 | $1,534,801 |
14 | Don A Hillesland | Aneta, ND 58212 | $1,531,701 |
15 | David Hillesland | Aneta, ND 58212 | $1,494,284 |
16 | Michael W Yoney | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $1,471,115 |
17 | Dennis/rebecca Anderson Jv | Lakota, ND 58344 | $1,466,197 |
18 | Randy Schaley | Niagara, ND 58266 | $1,437,884 |
19 | Jeanne Schaley | Niagara, ND 58266 | $1,435,446 |
20 | Timothy James Haakenson | Aneta, ND 58212 | $1,406,150 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>