Market Gains in Pembina County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 259
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Pembina County, North Dakota totaled $2,271,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ronald Lee Sharp | Hamilton, ND 58238 | $14,748 |
42 | Randy John Mcmartin | Saint Thomas, ND 58276 | $14,526 |
43 | Rgm Farms Randall R Emanuelson Etal Ptr | Drayton, ND 58225 | $14,339 |
44 | Jay R Olson | Glasston, ND 58236 | $13,998 |
45 | Ted Lamar Juhl | Drayton, ND 58225 | $13,619 |
46 | Randall Edward Wagner | Neche, ND 58265 | $13,578 |
47 | Russell Valdimar Hannesson | Mountain, ND 58262 | $13,365 |
48 | Symington / Clayton & Barbara Jv | Neche, ND 58265 | $13,299 |
49 | Thomas Arthur Vaughn | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $12,751 |
50 | William Clarence Gunderson | Bathgate, ND 58216 | $12,649 |
51 | Newell Bros Farms | Neche, ND 58265 | $12,416 |
52 | Triple E Farms Inc | Drayton, ND 58225 | $12,148 |
53 | Dennis Lembke | Saint Thomas, ND 58276 | $11,970 |
54 | Alvin James Hoselton | Drayton, ND 58225 | $11,837 |
55 | Hornung/steve & Scott Jv | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $11,514 |
56 | Heuchert Bros Llp | Saint Thomas, ND 58276 | $11,481 |
57 | Gordon Sondeland | Langdon, ND 58249 | $11,442 |
58 | Leo John Lage | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $11,337 |
59 | James O Winkler | Saraland, AL 36571 | $11,199 |
60 | Peter Christian Carson | Saint Thomas, ND 58276 | $10,981 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”