Farm Subsidy information
Pembina County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Pembina County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 469
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pembina County, North Dakota totaled $54,376,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Scott Mahar | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $141,700 |
62 | Paul Carlton Myrdal | Edinburg, ND 58227 | $139,880 |
63 | Craig William Sharp | Hamilton, ND 58238 | $137,489 |
64 | Gwen Adele Emerson | Pembina, ND 58271 | $134,517 |
65 | Douglas Wayne Olason | Hensel, ND 58241 | $132,554 |
66 | Christenson Farms Inc | Drayton, ND 58225 | $128,630 |
67 | Richard Dale Demars | Bathgate, ND 58216 | $127,593 |
68 | Benjamin Ryan Tucker | Saint Thomas, ND 58276 | $126,331 |
69 | Bradley Charles Schuster | Drayton, ND 58225 | $125,121 |
70 | Halls G4 Llp | Edinburg, ND 58227 | $125,000 |
71 | , | $125,000 | |
72 | Michael Richard Brown | Bathgate, ND 58216 | $124,290 |
73 | David Theron Fedje | Hoople, ND 58243 | $124,177 |
74 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $124,020 |
75 | James Adelord Longtin | Neche, ND 58265 | $123,854 |
76 | , | $122,258 | |
77 | Donald Arthur Emerson | Pembina, ND 58271 | $120,630 |
78 | Andrew Scott Petersen | Grafton, ND 58237 | $120,317 |
79 | William Petersen | Grafton, ND 58237 | $118,296 |
80 | Bonita Mcmartin | Saint Thomas, ND 58276 | $118,245 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”