Conservation Reserve Program in Pembina County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 175
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Pembina County, North Dakota totaled $786,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Craig Roy Vaughn | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $4,855 |
62 | Darrell Allan Kemnitz | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $4,738 |
63 | Denise Hoffbeck | Marine St Crx, MN 55047 | $4,695 |
64 | Longtin Farms | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $4,691 |
65 | Ronald Keeley | Port St Lucie, FL 34986 | $4,337 |
66 | Sand Hills Hunting Llp | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $4,312 |
67 | Matt Bjornson | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $4,176 |
68 | Newell Bros Farms | Neche, ND 58265 | $4,162 |
69 | Allan Paul | Fargo, ND 58104 | $3,996 |
70 | Raymond Eastman | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $3,957 |
71 | Marlowe Jay Coulthart | Drayton, ND 58225 | $3,914 |
72 | Trevor Kneeshaw | Pembina, ND 58271 | $3,870 |
73 | Craig Brumbaugh | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $3,790 |
74 | Ruth Sharp | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $3,666 |
75 | James Patrick Eagan | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $3,596 |
76 | Troy Hannesson | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $3,565 |
77 | Peter L Keeley | Fort Myers, FL 33913 | $3,483 |
78 | Erwin Goschke | Chula Vista, CA 91910 | $3,380 |
79 | Carpenter Properties LLC | Austin, TX 78732 | $3,288 |
80 | Raymond Verville | Clinton, WA 98236 | $3,282 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”