Loan Deficiency in Pembina County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 650
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Pembina County, North Dakota totaled $29,107,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Gary Douglas Warner | Pembina, ND 58271 | $94,026 |
102 | Dr H H Eelkema | Saint Thomas, ND 58276 | $93,772 |
103 | Crystal Seed Potato Co | Crystal, ND 58222 | $92,515 |
104 | Douglas Leon Dubourt | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $92,054 |
105 | John Emmett Johnson | Langdon, ND 58249 | $91,300 |
106 | Mahar Farms | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $89,853 |
107 | Mark Edward Demars | Bathgate, ND 58216 | $89,262 |
108 | Richard Margerum | Pembina, ND 58271 | $88,639 |
109 | Craig Allen Holter | Drayton, ND 58225 | $88,297 |
110 | Russell Valdimar Hannesson | Mountain, ND 58262 | $87,264 |
111 | Becker Farms | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $87,002 |
112 | Timothy Alfred Lunde | Saint Thomas, ND 58276 | $86,702 |
113 | Helgoe Farm Inc | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $86,670 |
114 | Carson Martin | Hamilton, ND 58238 | $86,606 |
115 | Marlowe Jay Coulthart | Drayton, ND 58225 | $86,586 |
116 | Engelmann Farms Inc | Hoople, ND 58243 | $86,334 |
117 | Baldwin Farms Inc | Saint Thomas, ND 58276 | $85,540 |
118 | Mcm Inc | Saint Thomas, ND 58276 | $84,403 |
119 | V Robert Fitzsimonds | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $83,233 |
120 | Hornung/steve & Scott Jv | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $83,065 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”