Market Loss Assistance Program in Pembina County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 969
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Pembina County, North Dakota totaled $25,727,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | George Dietrich Sons Inc | Crystal, ND 58222 | $75,781 |
102 | Richard Margerum | Pembina, ND 58271 | $75,464 |
103 | Melvin Juhl Est | Bowesmont, ND 58225 | $75,361 |
104 | Russell Valdimar Hannesson | Mountain, ND 58262 | $75,031 |
105 | Thorfinnson Farms | Mountain, ND 58262 | $74,425 |
106 | George C Meagher | Pembina, ND 58271 | $74,278 |
107 | Karel Farms | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $73,354 |
108 | Mark Ratchenski Inc | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $73,039 |
109 | Kevin John Lee | Saint Thomas, ND 58276 | $72,913 |
110 | Camburn Sigurdur Shephard | Crystal, ND 58222 | $72,876 |
111 | Robert Leroy Olson | Glasston, ND 58236 | $72,757 |
112 | Michael Roy Stellon | Drayton, ND 58225 | $72,502 |
113 | Lyndon Gene Juhl | Drayton, ND 58225 | $72,431 |
114 | Dwight William Wilson | Pembina, ND 58271 | $72,403 |
115 | Mark Edward Demars | Bathgate, ND 58216 | $72,166 |
116 | Richard Allen Buchholtz | Saint Thomas, ND 58276 | $72,140 |
117 | James Adelord Longtin | Neche, ND 58265 | $71,232 |
118 | Sherry Fleming | Hamilton, ND 58238 | $70,737 |
119 | Randall Edward Wagner | Neche, ND 58265 | $70,542 |
120 | Dwight Lee Lane | Glasston, ND 58236 | $70,004 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”