Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Pierce County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 179
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Pierce County, North Dakota totaled $1,437,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Rockie Kukla | Barton, ND 58384 | $4,354 |
102 | Mark Duane Koenig | Rugby, ND 58368 | $4,318 |
103 | Brian Brossart Irrevocable Trust | Rugby, ND 58368 | $4,284 |
104 | Jdl Farms %loren Anderson Mgr | Minneapolis, MN 55401 | $3,984 |
105 | Daryl Wesley Jordan | Rugby, ND 58368 | $3,983 |
106 | Dale Gerald Klein | Rugby, ND 58368 | $3,769 |
107 | Brian David Klein | Rugby, ND 58368 | $3,769 |
108 | Brenda G Jaeger-das | San Diego, CA 92101 | $3,742 |
109 | Jay Jordan | Rugby, ND 58368 | $3,631 |
110 | David R Migler | Rugby, ND 58368 | $3,584 |
111 | Kyler Lemar | Rugby, ND 58368 | $3,446 |
112 | Gregory Alan Wolfe | Harvey, ND 58341 | $3,436 |
113 | Jason Martin | Rugby, ND 58368 | $3,421 |
114 | Christopher J Heilman | Rugby, ND 58368 | $3,327 |
115 | Camron Atkinson | Willow City, ND 58384 | $3,300 |
116 | Jeffrey Eldon Slaubaugh | Wolford, ND 58385 | $3,254 |
117 | Kevin Borgen | Wolford, ND 58385 | $3,195 |
118 | Gregory A Stahl | Rugby, ND 58368 | $3,145 |
119 | Jerald J Bohl | Rugby, ND 58368 | $3,059 |
120 | Rita Neigum Limited Partnership | Rugby, ND 58368 | $3,057 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”