Farm Subsidy information
Pierce County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Pierce County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 658
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pierce County, North Dakota totaled $25,334,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Jared Arlien | Rugby, ND 58368 | $29,155 |
162 | Myron Stutrud | Rugby, ND 58368 | $29,133 |
163 | Marshalle Fedje | Barton, ND 58384 | $28,951 |
164 | Nathaniel Bohl | Rugby, ND 58368 | $28,948 |
165 | Thomas Thingvold | Willow City, ND 58384 | $28,655 |
166 | James B Teigen | Rugby, ND 58368 | $28,642 |
167 | Leonard Deplazes Jr | York, ND 58386 | $28,293 |
168 | Brian Brossart Irrevocable Trust | Rugby, ND 58368 | $28,248 |
169 | James R Selensky | Rugby, ND 58368 | $27,943 |
170 | Brian David Klein | Rugby, ND 58368 | $27,921 |
171 | Randy Heidlebaugh | Rugby, ND 58368 | $27,920 |
172 | Jay Welk | Willow City, ND 58384 | $27,574 |
173 | Dale Gerald Klein | Rugby, ND 58368 | $26,835 |
174 | Ripplinger Family Lllp | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $26,813 |
175 | Alan Dean Fosness | Willow City, ND 58384 | $26,625 |
176 | Tim Ostrem | Rugby, ND 58368 | $26,549 |
177 | Mark Thiel | Rugby, ND 58368 | $26,084 |
178 | Pamela A Schmitt | Rugby, ND 58368 | $25,982 |
179 | Gregory Mack | Rugby, ND 58368 | $25,850 |
180 | Dakota Heritage Bank Of North Dak ** | Hope, ND 58046 | $25,833 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”