Farm Subsidy information
Pierce County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Pierce County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,197
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pierce County, North Dakota totaled $464,910,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Follman Farms | York, ND 58386 | $4,045,471 |
2 | Kenneth Mattern | Rugby, ND 58368 | $3,470,785 |
3 | Wayne Walter Wentz | Rugby, ND 58368 | $2,257,802 |
4 | Alfred Jacobson | Rugby, ND 58368 | $2,211,252 |
5 | Ernest Thomas Streifel | Harvey, ND 58341 | $2,188,574 |
6 | Richard A Schmaltz | Rugby, ND 58368 | $2,139,463 |
7 | Timothy J Wolfe | Esmond, ND 58332 | $2,068,088 |
8 | Scott Johnson | Rugby, ND 58368 | $1,870,402 |
9 | Timothy Lloyd Johnson | Rugby, ND 58368 | $1,843,132 |
10 | Daryl Klein | Balta, ND 58313 | $1,836,097 |
11 | Derrick Alfred Klein | Rugby, ND 58368 | $1,818,400 |
12 | Michael E Heidlebaugh | Rugby, ND 58368 | $1,802,275 |
13 | Dmb Farms Inc | Rugby, ND 58368 | $1,782,558 |
14 | Michael Dale Senger | Rugby, ND 58368 | $1,728,325 |
15 | Kenneth J Schaan | Rugby, ND 58368 | $1,695,336 |
16 | Gregory P Brossart | Rugby, ND 58368 | $1,670,752 |
17 | Cory Johnson | Rugby, ND 58368 | $1,613,192 |
18 | Randy Shane Oppen | Towner, ND 58788 | $1,590,620 |
19 | Chad Michael Duchscher | Rugby, ND 58368 | $1,575,176 |
20 | David L Kraft | Willow City, ND 58384 | $1,536,677 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>