Farm Subsidy information
Pierce County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Pierce County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 658
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pierce County, North Dakota totaled $25,334,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Follman Farms | York, ND 58386 | $286,057 |
2 | Kenneth Mattern | Rugby, ND 58368 | $238,152 |
3 | Farm Credit Services Of Nd ** | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $201,073 |
4 | Merchants Bank ** | Rugby, ND 58368 | $194,660 |
5 | Heilman Farms | Rugby, ND 58368 | $178,812 |
6 | North Star Community Credit Union ** | Maddock, ND 58348 | $173,337 |
7 | Troy Joseph Voeller | Rugby, ND 58368 | $167,580 |
8 | Christopher Eric Brossart | Wolford, ND 58385 | $161,076 |
9 | David L Kraft | Willow City, ND 58384 | $146,677 |
10 | Derrick Alfred Klein | Rugby, ND 58368 | $146,320 |
11 | Randy Shane Oppen | Towner, ND 58788 | $145,482 |
12 | Charles E Volk | Rugby, ND 58368 | $141,726 |
13 | Cory Johnson | Rugby, ND 58368 | $137,008 |
14 | Brandon B Grove | Rugby, ND 58368 | $134,571 |
15 | Scott Johnson | Rugby, ND 58368 | $132,383 |
16 | Chad Michael Duchscher | Rugby, ND 58368 | $129,145 |
17 | Ernest Thomas Streifel | Harvey, ND 58341 | $127,214 |
18 | Michael E Heidlebaugh | Rugby, ND 58368 | $122,746 |
19 | Kipp L Johnson | Rugby, ND 58368 | $121,775 |
20 | Kevin Duncan Allickson | Rugby, ND 58368 | $120,822 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>