Conservation Reserve Program in Pierce County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,131
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Pierce County, North Dakota totaled $58,027,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Edmund Hager Living Trust - Edmun | Rugby, ND 58368 | $371,868 |
22 | Elvern Duane Hageness | Rugby, ND 58368 | $364,168 |
23 | Douglas Anthony Wolfe | Harvey, ND 58341 | $355,468 |
24 | Gregory Alan Wolfe | Rugby, ND 58368 | $351,161 |
25 | Earl Stutrud | Rugby, ND 58368 | $349,739 |
26 | Pius Hagel | Garrison, ND 58540 | $349,181 |
27 | Michael J Lesmeister Jr | Harvey, ND 58341 | $340,216 |
28 | Salvinus Hoffert | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $331,229 |
29 | Jon Lindseth Farms | Rugby, ND 58368 | $323,108 |
30 | Thomas Reiger | Rugby, ND 58368 | $312,720 |
31 | Roger Chalmers | Rugby, ND 58368 | $311,063 |
32 | Victor M Ripplinger | Minot, ND 58701 | $310,723 |
33 | Elmer M Cox Revocable Trust | Ocean View, DE 19970 | $308,453 |
34 | Robert L Johnson | Madison, AL 35758 | $303,186 |
35 | Ripplinger Family Lllp | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $299,802 |
36 | Gary J Heintz | Kent, MN 56553 | $294,015 |
37 | Paul J Hornstein | Laughlin, NV 89028 | $288,708 |
38 | Derry Jones | Lake Bronson, MN 56734 | $288,039 |
39 | Oliver Stutrud | Rolla, ND 58367 | $282,509 |
40 | James B Teigen | Rugby, ND 58368 | $276,320 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”