Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Ramsey County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 163
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Ramsey County, North Dakota totaled $8,943,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Luann Stromme | Crary, ND 58327 | $112,217 |
22 | Malior Gette | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $110,852 |
23 | Todd R Erickstad | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $110,852 |
24 | Scott Ronald Anderson | Crary, ND 58327 | $107,308 |
25 | Larry Ivesdal | Edmore, ND 58330 | $104,557 |
26 | Jack Wilhelmi | Starkweather, ND 58377 | $103,997 |
27 | Todd Aronson | Crary, ND 58327 | $103,328 |
28 | Daryn Zinke | Crary, ND 58327 | $103,304 |
29 | Dennis Schiele | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $102,364 |
30 | Daryl Roy Evenson | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $100,871 |
31 | Steven Swanson | Lawton, ND 58345 | $98,950 |
32 | James R Ackerman | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $95,605 |
33 | Neal James Ackerman | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $92,175 |
34 | Mikal Lynn Erickstad | Starkweather, ND 58377 | $90,726 |
35 | Douglas Peter Becker | Crary, ND 58327 | $90,422 |
36 | Paul Allen Becker | Crary, ND 58327 | $90,422 |
37 | Bryce Hoime | Edmore, ND 58330 | $88,185 |
38 | Brent Newgard | Edmore, ND 58330 | $88,157 |
39 | Conrad Wayne Adahl | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $82,975 |
40 | Michael A Haugland | Lakota, ND 58344 | $80,637 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”