Total Conservation Programs in Ramsey County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,252
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Ramsey County, North Dakota totaled $61,878,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jack Sorum | Minot, ND 58703 | $173,215 |
102 | Terry R Smith | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $172,321 |
103 | Richard Wilcox Est | Starkweather, ND 58377 | $171,295 |
104 | Edwin Larry Werner | Starkweather, ND 58377 | $169,863 |
105 | Steven Swanson | Lawton, ND 58345 | $166,539 |
106 | Edward Arthur Miller | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $166,347 |
107 | Grant Settingsgard | Edmore, ND 58330 | $166,085 |
108 | Jacob J Penner | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $164,564 |
109 | Randall Lyle Sundeen | Brocket, ND 58321 | $163,493 |
110 | Anderson Revocable Trust | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $163,234 |
111 | Harold Glenn Eidsness | Lakota, ND 58344 | $162,945 |
112 | Thomas Halvorson | Lawton, ND 58345 | $161,739 |
113 | Garland Legacie Est | Edmore, ND 58330 | $161,332 |
114 | Sandra Newgard | Edmore, ND 58330 | $160,960 |
115 | Claude Langton | Mesa, AZ 85204 | $160,391 |
116 | Dorothy Yule Hauck | Utica, SD 57067 | $159,371 |
117 | John Olderbak | Warwick, ND 58381 | $158,587 |
118 | David Hugh Jones | Webster, ND 58382 | $156,768 |
119 | James Rice Est | Minneapolis, MN 55418 | $155,979 |
120 | Gary Halle Est | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $153,961 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”