Farm Subsidy information
Ransom County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Ransom County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 725
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ransom County, North Dakota totaled $27,481,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | T & N Lyons Farms | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $82,390 |
42 | Daryl Olson Farm Inc | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $81,472 |
43 | Dean R Torbenson | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $81,434 |
44 | Allan Henri Fugl | Verona, ND 58490 | $77,540 |
45 | Shane Michael Schlecht | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $76,504 |
46 | Gaylen Dick Farm Inc | Englevale, ND 58033 | $75,897 |
47 | Richard Reinke | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $73,312 |
48 | Steve Olson Farms LLC | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $73,219 |
49 | Michael D Mund | Milnor, ND 58060 | $71,186 |
50 | Future Vision Partnership | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $70,774 |
51 | Matthew W. Larson | Milnor, ND 58060 | $69,806 |
52 | Brian Vculek Farm | Crete, ND 58040 | $67,767 |
53 | Rachael Marie Hoistad | Forman, ND 58032 | $67,582 |
54 | David Larson Farm Inc | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $66,233 |
55 | Wallace James Carlson Jr | Fargo, ND 58104 | $64,936 |
56 | Jason Arthur Sorby | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $64,682 |
57 | Top Third Farms LLC | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $64,635 |
58 | Bergemann Farms Inc | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $61,535 |
59 | Bradley Alan Nims | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $60,222 |
60 | Travis Adolfs | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $59,924 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”