Farm Subsidy information
Ransom County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Ransom County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 559
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ransom County, North Dakota totaled $22,216,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Steven Eicholtz | Fargo, ND 58102 | $33,608 |
42 | Bruce Pantzke | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $32,807 |
43 | Schwab Properties Lllp | Englevale, ND 58033 | $32,288 |
44 | Paul Sandstrom | Emerado, ND 58228 | $31,799 |
45 | Duwayne T Bott | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $31,714 |
46 | Lone Tree Holdings Lllp | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $31,181 |
47 | Marlys Faller Family Trust | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $29,896 |
48 | Lorenzo Strand | Nome, ND 58062 | $29,668 |
49 | Double R Farms | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $29,655 |
50 | Scott Mcdaniel Farms Inc | Englevale, ND 58033 | $29,481 |
51 | , | $28,758 | |
52 | Ben A Lambrecht | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $28,623 |
53 | Isidore Group Lllp | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $28,509 |
54 | Walter Gardner Jr | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $28,120 |
55 | David - David D. Kloss Rev Living Trust Donald Klo | Fort Myers Beach, FL 33931 | $28,015 |
56 | Sheila Bergemann | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $27,882 |
57 | Barbara Jean Babcock | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $26,321 |
58 | Allan Henri Fugl | Verona, ND 58490 | $25,485 |
59 | Steven Trautman | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $24,518 |
60 | Kathy Faller | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $24,378 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”