Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Ransom County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 214
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Ransom County, North Dakota totaled $11,292,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David John Rotenberger | Milnor, ND 58060 | $81,281 |
42 | Joel Schmitz | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $81,043 |
43 | Lance Bueling | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $81,038 |
44 | Kirk Bueling | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $81,038 |
45 | Todd Mark | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $76,865 |
46 | Marshall Wallace Lien | Milnor, ND 58060 | $75,372 |
47 | Schultz Livestock Inc | Mcleod, ND 58057 | $74,503 |
48 | Dwight Krueger | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $73,686 |
49 | Eric Dale Mairs | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $71,320 |
50 | Wallace James Carlson Jr | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $68,740 |
51 | Sandness Brothers | Gwinner, ND 58040 | $68,701 |
52 | Daniel Thomas Spiekermeier | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $68,180 |
53 | Kerry Froemke | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $67,190 |
54 | Bradley T Loftsgard | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $64,092 |
55 | Daniel & Matthew Bartholomay Jv | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $62,691 |
56 | Jerome Herbert Freeberg | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $62,131 |
57 | Alden Kempel | Stirum, ND 58069 | $61,804 |
58 | Brent Strand | Nome, ND 58062 | $61,153 |
59 | Michael Joseph Olson | Milnor, ND 58060 | $60,383 |
60 | Russell & Kay Reinke Jv | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $57,910 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”